EU banking supervisor the European Banking Authority (EBA) announced the publication of a new report assessing the role of environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More and socialSocial criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. More risks in its prudential supervision framework for banks and investment firms, including recommendations for the acceleration of these risks across the Pillar 1 framework, which defines banks’ minimum capital requirements.
According to the EBA, the new report comes as environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More and socialSocial criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. More risks are expected to become more prominent over time, changing the risk profile for the banking sector, across financial categories such as credit and market risk, as well as operational risks, and potentially affecting individual institutions as well as the overall financial system’s stability.
The report includes a series of short-term actions recommended by the EBA to be taken over the next three years, including incorporating environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More risks as part of stress testing programs, encouraging the inclusion of environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More and socialSocial criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. More factors as part of external credit assessments by credit rating agencies, and as part of due diligence requirements and valuation of immovable property collateral. Additional near-term recommendations include requiring institutions to identify whether environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More and socialSocial criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. More factors constitute triggers of operational risk losses, and to develop environment-related concentration risk metrics as part of supervisory reporting.
On a longer-term basis, the EBA report presents possible revisions of the Pillar 1 framework, in light of the increased importance of environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More and socialSocial criteria examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. More risks, including the possible use of scenario analysis to enhance the forward-looking elements of the prudential framework, the role of transition plans as part of the development of further risk-based enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, reassessing the appropriateness of revising the internal ratings based (IRB) supervisory formula and the standard approach for credit risk to better reflect environmentalEnvironmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. More risk, and introducing environment-related concentration risk metrics under the Pillar 1 framework.
The report also indicated that the EBA does not currently support the introduction of a “green supporting factor,” which would reduce prudential capital requirements for environmentally sustainable exposures, or a “brown penalizing factor,” which would conversely increase capital requirements for environmentally harmful assets.
Click here to access the EBA report.