SEC Fines Invesco $17.5 Million for Misleading ESG Investing Claims

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it has charged global asset manager Invesco for making misleading claims regarding its ESG-related investments, including overstating the proportion of assets under management that integrated ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More considerations.
Invesco has agreed to pay a $17.5 million civil penalty to settle the SEC’s charges, while not admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations.
According to the SEC’s order, while Invesco claimed in its marketing materials from 2020 to 2022 that between 70% – 94% of its parent company’s assets under management were “ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More integrated,” these amounts included a significant proportion of assets held in passive ETFs, that did not consider ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More factors in investment decisions.
The SEC added that despite making its ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More integration claims, “Invesco lacked any written policy defining ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More integration.”
The case marks the latest ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More investment-related action for the SEC, following the Commission’s announcement last month that it had charged ETF provider WisdomTree after finding that funds marketed by the firm as incorporating ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More factors failed to comply with their own criteria, by investing in companies involved in fossil fuel and tobacco activities. WisdomTree paid $4 million to settle the charges.
Sanjay Wadhwa, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said:
“As stated in the order, Invesco saw commercial value in claiming that a high percentage of company-wide assets were ESGEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations that socially conscious investors use to screen potential investments. More integrated. But saying it doesn’t make it so. Companies should be straightforward with their clients and investors rather than seeking to capitalize on investing trends and buzzwords.”